FIRST GENERATION.

 

explanation of arrangement.—This will be readily understood. The descendants are numbered consecutively on the left hand side of the page, and a star (*) prefixed to a number indicates that the record of the person thus designated is carried forward and will be found in the succeeding generation under the same number, this time located in the center of the line. All the children of one family thus carried forward are grouped under a caption designating the parents, and the eldest child takes precedence in the arrangement.

 

1.

George Felt is found in Charlestown, Mass., in 1633.  He was born in 1601, and tradition relates that he came to America with Endicott.' He was not among the first settlers of Charles-town, there being a few persons there in 1628, but the following year about one hundred people came with Thomas Graves from Salem, and laid the foundation of the town, which they named in honor of Charles the First. Charlestown was incorporated June 24. 1629, and the first church was organized November 2, 1632. The original town was laid out in two-acre divisions, and each settler was granted one of them for a homestead. We have the testimony of George Felt himself that the year of his advent in this town was that already named, for in 1681 he describes him­self as about 80 years of age, and testifies "that the town of Charlestown gave him an house plott of two acres of land lying in the common on the left hand as you go to Cambridge betwixt the ground that was Rice Morrisses and Goble's, which is now in the hands of ThomasWelch Senr, which plott was given him about forty-eight years since."

 

The wife of George Felt was Elizabeth,2 daughter of widow Prudence Wilkinson,3 whose home in Charlestown was on the

----

1 John Endicott reached Salem with a small party in September, 1628.

 

2 Rev. Joseph B. Felt states that an Elizabeth Felt died in 1662, aged 50 years. If this was the wife of George Felt, he subsequently married another of the same baptismal name.

 

3 Widow Prudence Wilkinson in her will, dated "1655, II : Mo : 9, day," names her son John and her daughter Eliza. Felt.

----

 

south side of Mill Hill, nearly adjoining that of her son-in-law. Whether he married in Charlestown, or was already married when he came, is cause for conjecture, but it is probable that they were already ma Tied and brought children with them.

 

The town of Charlestown, although at the time of its annexa­tion to Boston in 1873, the smallest in the State, covering only about 600 acres, originally embraced within its limits the territory now contained in Woburn, Burlington, Stoneham, Mai­den, Somerville, and parts of Reading, Medford, Cambridge, and Arlington. On the 10th of January, 1634. it was agreed at a meeting of the inhabitants, "Yt ye inhab. undr mentioned have planting ground laid out unto them bet. the east end of the lotis above mentioned at the Creek, having new town pale on the south." Of this division "George ffelt" received four acres. This was on the "Mistick side," or beyond the river of that name and within the confines of the present town of Everett, On this side of the river he subsequently acquired considerable land, as will appear presently.

 

Up to this time all public business had been transacted by a general convention of the people, but this practice having become cumbersome and unsatisfactory, it was thought best to organize a new form of town government; consequently, on the l0th of February, 1634-5, the following "town order" creating a board of selectmen was passed : —

 

''An ordr made by the Inhabitants of Charlestowne At a ffull meeting, for the Governmt of the Towne by Selectmen:

 

"1634. In consideration of the great trouble and chearg of the Inhabitants of Charlestowne by reason of the Frequent meeting of the townsmen in generall, and yt by reason of many men meeting things were not so easily brought unto a ioynt Issue: It is therefore agreed by the sayde townesmen ioytly that these eleuen men whose names are written on the other syde, with the advise of Pastor and teacher desired in any case of conscience, shall entreat of all such busines as shall concerne the townsmen, The choise of officers excepted, and what they or the greater part of them shall conclude of, the rest of the towne willingly to submit Vnto as their owne pper act, and these 13 (sic) to contineu in imployment for one yeare next ensuing the date hereof, being dated this: l0th of February 1634.

 

"In wittnes of this agreement wee whose names are vnder written haue set to or hands,"

 

There were thirty-three signers to this order, among them George Felt, and it will be observed that his signature, which may yet be seen upon the ancient records of Charlestown, is written felch.  This, or feltch, is thought to have been the original name, which was easily and naturally contracted into felt.   All the descendants of George have written the name Felt.

 

By the year 1638 the necessity of an accurate public record of their possessions was felt by the people of Charlestown, and on the 26th of .. the first month (March) Abraham Palmer was •' chosen by the Towne for keepeing the Towne Booke, as also to Record all pprieties of Houses, Lands, Meadow or Pasture, as any Inhabitants of ye Towne are, or shall bee possest of accord: to an ordr of Court provided in yt behalfe."

 

Mr, Palmer, who was the second incumbent of the town clerk's office, having accomplished this, the following entry appears upon

the records: —

 

    "1638.    On the 28th day of the X month was taken A True Record of  all  such  houses & Lands  as are possessed by the Inhabitants of Charlstown, whethr by purchase, by gift from the" Towne, or by allottments as they were devided amongst them by a Joynt Consent aftr the Genl Court had setled theire Bounds, by granting eight miles from the old Meeting house into the Contry Northwest Northrly, &c. the bounds of the sd Towne Lying or being bettwixt Cambridge alias New Towne, on the West South west, Si Boston Land on the East as it apprs upon Record by the sever" grants of Gen" Courts to all the afforesd Bounds."

 

George Felt was found to be the owner of the following prop­erty within the limits of the town :

 

"1.    One Dwelling house with a garden plott, scituate on the south west of the mill hill, butting southward upon Charls river, northeast upon crooked lane, bounded on the norwest by Nicolas Trerrice, and on the southeast by Ben. Hubbard.'

 

"2.    One milch cow common. 2

 

"3. ffive acres of wood land by estimation, more or lesse, scituate in misticke feilde, butting south upon the high way towards the south river, north upon the woodland, bounded on the west by Pru Wilkinson, and on the east by Rob Hayle.3

----

1 and 2. These two were within the limits of the present Charlestown District of Boston,

3 Within the present limits of Everett.

====

 

 

    "4. Haulf an acre of meaddow by estimation, more or lesse, lying in mistick marshes, butting west towards the north river, bounded on the north by Will Dade, and on the south by George Bunker.'

 

    "5. ffive acres of woodland by estimation, more or lesse, scituate in mistick feilde, butting northeast upon Nicolas Stowers, southwest upon Ric. Palgrave, bounded on the north­west by Phillip Drinker, and on the southeast by Rice Morrice.2

 

    "6. ffifteene acres of woodland, more or lesse, scituate in mistick feilde, butting northeast upon Abr. Palmer and James mathewes, southwest upon Ed Convers, bounded on the north­west by Tho Lynde, and on the southeast by James Pemberton.3

 

    "7. Thirtie and eight acres of land, more or lesse, scituate in waterfeilde, butting northwest upon ffrancis Norton, southeast upon Rich Palgrave and Tho Peirce, bounded on the southwest by Edward Sturges, and on the northeast by home pond."4

 

    Thus it appears that George Felt was the owner of a very respectable property, as has previously been intimated.

 

    On the 19th of January, 1639-40). Elizabeth Felt, the wife of George, was admitted to the communion of the first Church, and a week later, January 26th, presented her three children, Elizabeth, Mary, and George, for baptism. No record has been found to show that the father was a member of the Charlestown Church. Elder John Green, in his entry of the above mentioned baptisms, calls the name Felch, although he recorded Elizabeth, the mother, at the time of her admission to the church, as Felt.

 

    Some time during the year 1640, George Felt obtained three hundred acres of land from John Philips, a Welshman, at Broad Cove on Casco Bay, in Maine, and by 1643 had become one of the pioneer settlers of North Yarmouth. "The advent of George Felt in Broad Cove may be said to be the birthday of North Yarmouth." This locality was then called Wescustogo by the Indians. Upon this land he built a stone house, or garrison, but his title to the property not proving sufficient, he re-purchased it in 1643 of Richard Vines, the agent of Sir Ferdinando Gorges, who held a patent of all the lands embraced within the territory of Maine, east of the Sagadahoc River. After a few years' residence

====

1 Within the limits of the present town of Everett.

2 In the Sixth Ward of the city of Maiden.

3 In Maiden.                                     4 In the town of Woburn.

====

 

 

 

at Wescustogo, George Felt returned to Charlestown and took up his abode on "Mistick side," and when the town of Maiden was incorporated, May 2, 1649, he was found to reside within its limits. About this time he disposed of a portion of his "Mistick side '' property, as witnessed by the following deeds :

 

    "Know all men by these presents, that I Georg Felch, Inhabi­tant of Charlestown, on Mistike syde, doe by this acknowledge that I have sould, and am full payd for it, unto Tames Barret, of the same town, three akers of Arrable land, more or lesse, which I bought of ffrancis Mills, which sayd land lyes on Mistik syde, within the rayles, bounded on the east syde by Richard Kettell, and by the cuntry high way on the west syde, bounded on the north by Edward Carrington, and on the south by A high way. And the sayd James Barret is to enjoy and to hould the sayd three akers of land for him and his heighers for ever.

 

    "In witness hereof, I, Georg ffelch, have set my hand to a bill of sale of this same, the 26th day. of the 3rd moneth 1648." This land was within the present limits of Everett.

 

    "Know all men by these presents, that I, Georg Felch, of Charlestown, do acknowledge that I have sould unto Gardy James of the same towne, half my Ten Aker Lott, lying on Mistik syde, the other halfe of which Lott my mother Wilkinson occu-pieth, and enjoyeth, and I doe hereby resign over all my right, titell, and interest in the sayd half ten Aker Lott unto the sayd Gardy James, to be his and his heigres for ever.

 

    "Witness my hand this 1st day of the 2d mo. 1649"

 

    In a deed1 given Aug. 4, 1664, to John Phillips of Boston, in which he describes himself as of "Casco in New England, mason," he disposes of his "dwelling house with the barne, out houseing & Land and meadow ground," also twenty acres of land "belonging to the houselott," and "allso sixteen acres and a halfe of swamp," two acres in "Charlestowne Common." twenty-four acres in "Charles-towne comons on Misticke side near spott pond," and fourteen acres of meadow "lying in Charlestowne bounds." At the time this deed was given he had already returned to Casco Bay, and this was the closing out of his possessions in Massachusetts.

 

    During  the time of his absence from  Maine, George Felt.

====

1Middlesex Land Records, Vol. 3, page 154.

====

 

 

retained the ownership of his possessions there, and about 1660 returned to Broad Cove. The deposition of his son Moses, made Nov. 30, 1733, and recorded in Book 17, page 76, of York County Records, in which he states "that he lived in North Yarmouth in Casco Bay, abt fourteen years before the Narragansett Indian Warr broke out,'' fixes this year as the time of his return.

   

    In 1670 he added to his possessions by another purchase from John Philips, of 2,000 acres of land at Broad Cove, for which he paid the sum of sixty pounds. He had already lived upon it three years and improved it.

 

    In 1675 the Narragansett War broke out and continued until 1678. We have no account of George Felt's flight from his home, but are told that North Yarmouth was deserted during the war, and undoubtedly for this period he sojourned elsewhere. After peace was restored he returned, and continued upon his plantation until 1684, when, by a piece of glaring injustice, he was despoiled of the accumulations of a lifetime. In order to clearly show how this was brought about, the following account, adapted from an article written by William H. Sargent, Esq., of Portland, on the "Derivation of Titles in North Yarmouth,"1 is presented in connection with facts obtained from other sources.

 

    The title to all lands in Maine originated in a grant made by King James I, in April, 1606, to the Council of Plymouth.  The Council on the 10th of August, 1622, granted to Sir Ferdinando. Gorges and Captain John Mason "all the lands situated be­tween the rivers Merrimack and Sagadahock, extending back to the great lakes and the River of Canada." Gorges and Mason obtained a new patent from the King, but in 1634 divided their property, Gorges taking all east of the Piscataqua, and Mason the western part. Gorges' patent for his portion, procured from the King, bears date April 3, 1639. He obtained also power to govern his province, and appointed Richard Vines his steward general, who, as Gorges' agent, sold to George Felt the land which he had already purchased of John Phillips, the Welshman. At this early day no provision had been made for the recording of deeds, and many of the older evidences of title were over­looked when the practice of recording land had become estab­lished.

====

1Published in Old Times in North Yarmouth, page 424.

====

 

 

    In 1630 the Council of Plymouth infringed upon its grant to Gorges by giving to John Dy and others the Province of Lygonia, a tract lying between Capes Porpoise and Elizabeth, and extend-ing forty miles inland. This did not include Broad Cove, where George Felt had his possessions, that being situated farther east. The following year a company came over in the ship "Plough" to settle under this last named patent, but being dissatisfied with the country, dispersed. About 1643. Col. Alexander Rigby ob­tained a nominal interest from the survivors, in the Province of Lygonia, evidently with the hope of being able to oust Gorges and thus gain a tangible interest in the property, and commis­sioned his friend, George Cleeves, as deputy governor, and soon after set up a claim to all the lands as far east as the Sagadahock, thus bringing Broad Cove in North Yarmouth within their claim. '• This gave rise to interminable disputes and strife between the Rigby and Gorges factions, that continued, every now and then breaking out afresh, and were never finally composed till both claimants had either submitted to or sold out to Massachusetts."

 

    When the Narragansett war occurred the settlement of North Yarmouth was deserted and the town destroyed by the Indians. After the return of peace in 1678, the survivors of the war re­turned, the title to the property was purchased by Massachusetts of Gorges' heir, Sir Thomas Danforth appointed Provincial President, and at a court held by him at York in 1680 North Yarmouth was incorporated as a plantation. June 23d of this year George Felt conveyed to Walter Gendall of Spurwink, "one hundred acres of upland lying and being on the eastward side of George Felt's ould house in Casco Bay, about eighty rodd from sd house, vizt: beginning at a three forked bla(ck) oake tree neare the highway, being marked on both sides, and so down to ye water side, and then to runne upon a square untill the whole hundred acres be fully compleated and accomplished, with priviledg and full propriety and benefitt of the sea down to low water marke : bredth of his sd tract of land, with four acres of fresh meaddows lying about three miles from Felt's ould feild, and two acres of salt meddows at the head of Great Cove whr Walter Gendall pleaseth to lay it out, with all the meddows be­longing to the hundred acres of upland, with all the mines, minneralls, woods, underwoods, proffits, priviledges or lybertys, ease­ments, and all other appurtenances to the premises belonging or any way apartaining."  Gendall subsequently purchased other tracts of land, established a profitable saw-mill, and became a leading citi­zen and man of means. He was one of the trustees appointed to "lay out" the town, and in doing this, as the 2,000 acres belong­ing to George Felt happened to be wanted in the new division to the settlers, it was apparently taken without leave or license, presumably by claim to defect in the title, and was divided among the new coiners. Mr. Sargent adds, "I cannot close this sketch without a passing notice of one of the most glaring bits of injus­tice ever perpetrated by the cupidity of men. This was the course pursued by the new comers, by which the venerable George Felt was despoiled of the labors of a lifetime, and deprived of the large tract twice purchased by him, the second time from Gorges, on whom all of the titles depended. Instead of his right to his 2,000 acres, a petty sop of a few small lots was finally, after long importunity, thrown to his heirs, instead of their rightful inherit­ance. This is made all the more noticeable because they did respect Walter Gendall's title to what he had purchased from this very same Felt. If one title was good, so much the better should have been considered the one that had never been alien­ated. But then the one man was poor and old; the other was rich and influential."               

 

    Mr. Sargent is evidently in error in intimating that the 2,000 acres taken from George Felt was the same that he purchased of John Phillips in 1640, for in a petition to Governor Andros in 1688, George Felt himself stated that about 18 years before he had bought a plantation or farm of John Phillips of Boston, at a place called Great Cove in Casco Bay, containing about 2,000 acres, for which he paid 60 pounds, that he had occupied it three years before the purchase; and after the Indian war, it was withheld from him by Casco people, and he being impoverished could not ' recover it. He was then suffering from want, being about 87 years old" Further evidence is found in a deed2 given March 20, 1727, by Moses and George Felt, the son and grandson of George Felt of Broad Cove, to the committee of North Yarmouth, in which they recite that "whereas the said George Felt formerly bought of John Phillips of Casco Bay aforesd, a certain Tract or Parcell of land lying at Broad Cove, in Northyarmouth aforesd,

====

1 York County Records, Book III, page 76.

2 Proprietors' Records of North Yarmouth, page 52.

====

 

 

containing three hundred acres, beginning at ye falls called Felt's falls, and so down the Broad Cove or bay, to a Red Oak Tree near the water being the bounds of the lands which ye committee of the town of Northyarmouth formerly granted to Walter Gendall, and from sd waterside and falls to run up into the wilderness, upon a square, until the said Three Hundred Acres be fully com-pleated, and also three acres of salt marsh at Broad Cove and four acres of fresh meadow at some distance from said Felt's house: which lands and premises the aforesaid George Felt again purchase of ye agent of Sir Ferdinando Gorges about ye year 1643: and the said Felt built a house thereon and lived in it, and possessed and improved ye said land and premises above forty years without molestation, and until ye year 1684, excepting one hundred acres thereof lying next to the land of yc said Walter Gendall. and the aforesd three acres of salt marsh, and also the four acres of fresh meadow which the s George Felt in ye year 1680, sold to the said Walter Gendall, who improved the same till driven off by the Indian Enemy in the year 1688. And the sd George Felt, in the year 1684, gave and granted the remaining two hundred acres of the aforesd tract of land unto the said Moses and George Felt, to be equally divided between them, who continued in the peaceable possession of the said house and land until drove off by the Indians in the year 1688."

 

    The above serves to show that Felt's original purchase was 300 acres, the title to which was confirmed by repurchase of Gorges and never afterwards disputed, while the 2,000 acres of which he was deprived was that purchased of Phillips in 1670 for the sum of sixty pounds. Undoubtedly Phillips' title rested upon an Indian deed, to which sort at the time of the resettlement of North Yarmouth no respect was paid, and which were subse­quently decided by the Court to be invalid, valid titles resting only upon the Gorges patent.

 

    After the disposition of a portion of his property to Walter Gendall George Felt returned to Maiden, notwithstanding the statement made in the deed given by Moses and George Felt 3d, and previously here quoted, that he lived at Casco Bay "until ye year 1684." This move was probably rendered necessary by the fact that he was aged and feeble and unable to longer struggle for existence upon his farm. His wife accompanied him and May 29, 1681, "upon hearing the petition of James Nichols, Sr. of Malden" (his son-in-law) the General Court ordered" that George Felt and his wife be accounted inhabitants of the town of Maiden and accordingly the Selectmen of the town to take care of them." ' This care was given after a fashion and the same year Goodman Cully was paid 10 shillings for "Hows room" for them. Thus the once possessor of over 2,000 acres became the first town charge of Maiden. In 1684 George Felt conveyed all that was left of his 300 acres at Casco Bay to his son and grand­son and was undoubtedly able to live upon the proceeds of the sale for a time, for it was not until October 1, 1686 that the town of Maiden was called upon for further aid, when it was "Voted, that the Selectmen are to take care of ould felt till the County Courte."  June 22, 1688, George Felt petitioned for aid and redress in the following pathetic form: —

 

The Humble Petition of George Felt Senr of Mauldon,

 

"To his Excellency Sr Edmund Andros, Knt, one of his Majties most honor ourable privy bed chamber, Capt Generall and & Gov. in Chief in and over his Majties Territory and Dominion of New England in America 2

 

sheweth :

 

    That it is my grief that I am compelled to trouble yor Excellency at this time But having about eighteen years since purchased of one Jno Phillips of Bost, Gent., late Deceased, a farme or Plaintaintion at a Place called the Great Cove (in Casco Bay) containing about two thousand acres of upland and marsh as by a firm Deed under sd-Phillips hand and seale, for which I then paid him sixty pounds money, and improved sd Farme or plaintation severall years before I bought it so that the whole time of my occupying it was about one and twenty years, But some time after the late Indian Warr it was withheld from me by some of the inhabitants of sd Town of Caskoe Bay and being by sd warr much impoverished I could not recover it out of their hands. I also am now forced to suffer for want of convenient care taken of me in my present distresse being about Eighty seaven years old and very crasy and weak,

 

    Therefore, yor Petitionr recommendeth his case to yor Excellencies prudent consideration humbly beseaching and earnestly begging that if it seem meet and Convenient yor Excellency would be pleased to favor yor petionr that he may have confirmation of his sd lands undr such moderate quit rent, as well as an ordr to ye Townsmen of Maulden abovesd for something at present to re-leave ye petitioner in this his extreem poverty. The which shall farther oblige yor petionr as in duty bound daily to pray for y' Excellency."

 

    This redress was denied him, and we find further aid extended to him by the Selectmen of Maiden, viz.: —" June 8, 1691, voted that there be raised 4 or 5 pounds for the present supply of george felt and his wife to be paid in provision or in money."

 

====

1 General Court Record.

2 Massachusetts Archives, Vol. 128, page 282.

====

                               

The aged couple were now evidently growing feebler, and the town voted, March 14. 1692, with a prudent provision for rebate in case its charity should prove overgenerous "that the towne doe alow goodman nicols aleuen pound in or of money for this present yeare ensuing for the maintanance of his father and mother felt, if ether of them dy with in the year, after funiral charges, what is left to return to the selectmen or there order." The record ends here. The sturdy pioneer whose advent at North Yarmouth was reckoned as its "birth-day," and whose courageous manhood helped to establish it firmly upon the foun­dation of prosperity it enjoys to-day; wronged in his old age by those who should have aided him instead ; driven out to seek a home of charity; assured that his "funiral expenses" were pro­vided for, died in 1693, aged 92 years, and his wife "much advanced in years" followed him in 1694.

 

CHILDREN.'

*2.    i.    elizabeth, b.-----; bap. Jan. 26, 1639-40; m. William Larrabee.

 

*3.    ii.    mary, b.-----; bap. Jan. 26, 1639-40; m. James Nichols.

 

*4.    iii.    george, b.-----; bap. Jan. 26, 1639-40.

 

  5.    iv.   Moses, b.-----; bap. Dec. 20, 1641; probably died in childhood.

 

*6.    v.    aaron, b,-----.

 

*7.    vi.    moses, b. in 1651.

====

1 It is possible that there was also a son Peter.    See No. 48.    Appendix A.

====